You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 47 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

NIMH Collaborative Research on Treatment of Depression-Reply

Irene Elkin, PhD; M. Tracie Shea, PhD
National Institute of Mental Health Rockville, MD 20857

Joseph F. Collins, ScD; C. James Klett, PhD
Veterans Administration Medical Center Perry Point, MD 21902

Stanley D. Imber, PhD
University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Stuart M. Sotsky, MD
George Washington University Washington, DC 20037

John T. Watkins, PhD
University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City, OK 73190

Morris B. Parloff, PhD
National Institute of Mental Health Rockville, MD 20857

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(7):684-685.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

Dr Klein raised two major issues in his critique of our article on the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: (1) the specific comparisons made between treatment conditions and the related probability levels for accepting differences between treatments as statistically significant, and (2) the role that the initial severity of depression plays in our study and in interpretation of the findings. We will focus our response on these two issues.

Dr Klein stated that the "meaningful pairwise contrasts are not stipulated" and that "counterproductive and arbitrary significance level 'adjustments' are inflicted on the data." In regard to the pairwise contrasts of interest, we stated in our article that "... the two major questions addressed were the following: (1) Is there evidence of the effectiveness of each of the psychotherapies, as compared both with the standard reference treatment of imipramine-CM and with the placebo plus CM (PLA-CM) control . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.