You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 3, March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Distinguishing Between Content and Form of Speech

Howard Berenbaum, PhD
Department of Psychology University of Illinois 603 E Daniel St Champaign, IL 61820

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48(3):280.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Shenton et al1 recently reported that the relatives of psychotic patients exhibited more thought disorder than normal control subjects. They also found that probands with higher thought disorder scores tended to have first-degree relatives with higher thought disorder scores. This was a well-conducted study, and the results are important for anyone who wishes to understand the phenomenology and etiology of schizophrenia.

My colleagues and I2 have previously reported that we did not find evidence of genetic influence on formal thought disorder in speech samples taken from the Gottesman-Shields twin sample. In addition, with the exception of verbosity, we did not find evidence of nongenetic familial influence. Thus, there appears to be a discrepancy between the two studies. Shenton et al found evidence of familial resemblance; with the exception of verbosity, we did not. Shenton et al proposed that the reason for the discrepancy is that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.