This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

DOUGLAS A. PURYEAR, MD; CHRIS CARSON, MD; REBECCA FUENTES, MD; THERESA VALLS, MD
Department of Psychiatry Southwestern Medical School University of Texas at Dallas 5323 Harry Hines Blvd Room F5.400 Dallas, TX 75235-9070

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(1):74.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Breier et al¹ and Carone et al² present interesting and important findings regarding the longterm course of schizophrenia. Their articles also illustrate how careful scientific work may ultimately lead to subjective conclusions. To the detriment of patients and families, their conclusions, as opposed to their data, may propagate an unduly pessimistic picture of schizophrenia.

Figure 2 in the article by Breier et al is strikingly graphic and subjective, with no scale on the abscissa. Drawn this way, it presents a more negative image than does their discussion of the phasic model.

Carone et al give a thoughtful discussion of their and others' findings, but they do so with some misinterpretations. Their findings do not "challenge the conclusions" of Harding et al.3 Harding et al found a very poor outcome in the early course of their patients. The good outcome they reported was at the 25-year . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?