You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 49 No. 11, November 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Drugs for Cocaine Dependence: Not Easy

Leo E. Hollister, MD
Harris County Psychiatric Center University of Texas Health Science Center 2800 S MacGregor Way PO Box 20249 Houston, TX 77225-0249

Kenneth Krajewski, MD; Terry Rustin, MD; Hamp Gillespie, PhD
Houston, Tex

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(11):905.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

A recent letter to the ARCHIVES reported some modestly favorable results in treating cocaine dependence in methadone-treated patients with buproprion hydrochloride.1 Starting from a different theoretical basis, we embarked on a double-blind evaluation of buproprion vs placebo in patients being treated only for cocaine dependence. Buproprion was chosen because, like cocaine, it is a high-affinity dopamine uptake inhibitor but, unlike cocaine, produces no euphoria or dependence. Thus, it might act to mitigate the actions of cocaine.2

We planned to exploit our 28-day inpatient treatment program to monitor the course of treatment in this study for a period of 21 days. Our limited goal was to determine whether buproprion might reduce craving for cocaine during this period. Our patients were largely young (median age, 27 years), male (38 men and eight women), inner city youth who were of low socioeconomic class and borderline intelligence (mean IQ, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.