You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 5 No. 5, November 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Salivation in Depressed Patients

A Longitudinal Study

GILBERT GOTTLIEB, Ph.D.; GEORGE PAULSON, M.D.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;5(5):468-471.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Research strategies may be broadly classified as "cross-sectional" or "longitudinal." In cross-sectional studies, one group of individuals is contrasted (perhaps repeatedly, perhaps once) with another group of individuals, and any difference which emerges is attributed to a preexisting or imposed difference between the groups (e.g., Caucasian-Negro, schizophrenic-depressive, group treated with imipramine hydrochloride [Tofranil]-group treated with nialamide [Niamid], psychotic-neurotic). Longitudinal studies, on the other hand, are those in which observations are repeated on the same individual (s) over a period of time, and any difference which emerges is ascribable to events affecting the individual (e.g., maturation, sickness, psychotherapy, training). In the latter instance, individuals set their own baseline as comparison points, whereas in cross-sectional studies the baseline for comparison is usually the performance of the "other group." Each strategy has particular advantages and disadvantages, and both yield data susceptible to interpretation (or misinterpretation, as the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

RALEIGH, N.C.

Psychology Laboratory and Psychiatry staff, Dorothea Dix Hospital, Raleigh, N.C.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 3, 1961.

This research was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Division of Research, North Carolina Hospitals Board of Control.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.