You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 12, December 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters To The Editor
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Transference Interpretations, Patients' Gender, and Dropout Rates-Reply

William E. Piper; Hassan F. A. Azim, MB; Anthony S. Joyce, PhD; Mary McCallum, PhD
Department of Psychiatry University of Alberta 8440 112 St Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(12):1002.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dr Sigal suggests additional analyses in three areas, and we have done these in two areas for the sample of 32 patients who had received a high score on quality of object relations. In the first area we correlated the PTI in each third of therapy with change in therapeutic alliance from that third to the next third. We also correlated therapeutic alliance in each third of therapy with change in PTI from that third to the next third. None of the correlations in either case were significant. Thus, no evidence of a particular causal direction was found.

In the second area we were unable to compare the PTI of dropouts with remainers because comparable sessions had not been analyzed with the Therapist Intervention Rating System.

In the third area we correlated PTI with therapeutic alliance and posttherapy outcome for males (n=11) and females (n=21) separately. Some gender differences were . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.