You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 6, June 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters To The Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder-Reply

Robert T. Rubin, MD, PhD
Neurosciences Research Center Allegheny-Singer Research Institute Medical College of Pennsylvania Allegheny Campus Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772

Ismael Mena, MD
Torrance, Calif

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(6):500-501.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Harris et al raise some important issues. First is the correspondence between their medial-frontal cortical' and our orbital-frontal2 areas, which they suggest are actually the same region (Brodmann areas 9 and 10). Our orbital-frontal extended from 3.2 cm to 4.8 cm above the orbital-meatal (OM) line on the right and from 3.2 cm to 6.4 cm above the OM line on the left. In contrast, in our calculation, their putatively similar areas extended from the level of the basal ganglia, about 6.4 cm above the OM line, to about 8.4 cm above the OM line. This is not to say that the two regions are completely separate; indeed, there may be some as yet undetermined degree of overlap that contains the area of increased 99Tm-HMPAO uptake.

Second is the question of scanner resolution. Harris et al suggest that their resolution, while one fourth that of ours (1.6 cm . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.