You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentaries
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Personality Theory

Clinical Practice, Social Development, and the Biology of Individual Differences

David Reiss, MD
Division of Research Department of Psychiatry George Washington University Ross Hall #613 2300 Eye St NW Washington, DC 20037

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(8):633-636.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE ARTICLE by Horowitz et al1 in this issue of the ARCHIVES is intended to introduce a complex procedure of personality assessment, the role-relationship method, to a wide and varied readership. Horowitz et al give a glimpse of the scientific and theoretical background of this approach, present a single example of how this approach is used, and finally give a brief summary of a novel program to assess the reliability and validity of this procedure. Since all these sections are intended to be introductory, none is detailed enough to provide a basis for a systematic clinical or scientific critique. Rather, in the spirit of this contribution, it is more productive to consider the article itself as a configuration of carefully arranged parts and to examine this configuration of clinical ideas and procedures as a whole.

See also pages 625, 637, 639, 642, 645, 646, 649, 651, and 654

In this . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.