This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Review of Two Practice Guidelines

John S. McIntyre, MD; A. Zarin Deborah, MD; Harold Alan Pincus, MD
Washington, DC

Department of Psychiatry St Mary's Hospital Rochester, NY 14611 Deborah A. Zarin, MD Harold Alan Pincus, MD Washington, DC

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(4):291-293.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PERSONS and colleagues¹ are to be commended for their detailed examination of two major practice guidelines on the care of patients with major depressive disorder. As they point out, practice guidelines have great potential, with important clinical, professional, and legal implications. In their article, they make a number of valuable and helpful suggestions. For example, their suggestion that practice guidelines undergo periodic revision is in agreement with the American Medical Association guide² and is consistent with the American Psychiatric Association (APA) practice guideline project³ (which calls for revisions at 3- to 5-year intervals). However, in addition to such valuable suggestions, Persons et al also make some factual errors, underplay the limitations in the research literature (and thus ignore the role of clinical consensus in developing guidelines), and, most important, appear not to understand that the main purpose of practice guidelines is to assist clinicians (in this case . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?