You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 9, September 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  COMMENTARY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Depression

A Controlled Clinical Trial of Desipramine

David J. Kupfer, MD; Ellen Frank, PhD
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic 3811 O'Hara St Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(9):775-776.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN THIS ISSUE of the ARCHIVES, Kocsis et al1 present the results of their study on maintenance treatment for chronic depression. This study is an important sequel to their equally important earlier demonstration that patients with various forms of chronic depression do, indeed, respond to appropriate pharmacotherapy.2 With the publication of these results, we now also have evidence that the vast majority of responders to pharmacotherapy remain well when they receive the maintenance pharmacotherapy. These results nicely parallel the earlier findings of Prien et al3 and Frank et al4 with respect to maintenance treatment of recurrent depression.

In their present report on maintenance outcomes, Kocsis et al1 also discuss the "low" response rates to acute-phase pharmacotherapy in this population. There are several plausible explanations for the response rates obtained in the acute phase of their trial. First, Kocsis and colleagues chose the most stringent definition . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.