You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 12, December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  COMMENTARIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

What Is the 'Right' Statistical Measure of Twin Concordance (or Diagnostic Reliability and Validity)?

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(12):1121-1124.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RECENT TWIN studies related to psychiatric disorders have used the tetrachoric correlation coefficient (TCC) as a statistical measure of twin concordance. While the TCC was introduced in 1901 by Karl Pearson,1-3 closely related in time and purpose with his development of the familiar product moment or Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), over most of this century the TCC has been little known and little used in research applications. However, it has remained of continuing interest to statisticians and psychometricians.4-8 In great part its lack of use in applications may be due to its computational complexity, a problem now solved by ready access to compuers.9-11

See also page 1126

The TCC measures 2x2 correlation quite differently from more commonly used and familiar measures such as the {psi} or K coefficients widely used in psychiatric research. Is the TCC the "right" measure to use to measure twin concordance? If not, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.