You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 12, December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  COMMENTARIES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Another View on the 'Right' Statistical Measure of Twin Concordance

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(12):1126-1128.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THIS ISSUE of the ARCHIVES includes a paper by Chmura Kraemer1 advocating the use of the K statistic and questioning the use of the tetrachoric correlation coeffiecient (TCC) in twin research in general and in our recent twin study2 in particular. Falconer3 suggested that many traits of biological interest are inherited multifactorially, but distributed discontinuously; the underlying continuum is related to the visible scale by the threshold on the continuous scale that corresponds to the discontinuity on the visible scale. If this underlying variation could be measured directly, it is assumed it would be normally distributed. The TCC is an estimate of the Pearson correlation coefficient between the latent continua. Large discrete genetic or environmental effects will falsify the assumption of bivariate normality as will certain kinds of genotype-environment interactions. The assumption of bivariate normality, however, cannot be tested directly with dichotomous items, which means that we . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.