You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 8 No. 2, February 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ego Strength and Physiological Responsivity

1. The Relationship of the Barron ES Scale to Skin Resistance, Finger Blood Volume, Heart Rate, and Muscle Potential Responses to Sound

ROBERT ROESSLER, M.D.; A. A. ALEXANDER, Ph.D.; NORMAN S. GREENFIELD, Ph.D.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1963;8(2):142-154.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I. Introduction

One of the problems which has confronted investigators of psychophysiology has been the selection of psychological parameters which can be quantified reliably and which can in turn be related reliably to physiological measures.33 Many of the early attempts to relate psychological to physiological functioning compared psychiatric diagnostic groups on various physiological measures; these efforts met with little success, the physiological findings for a given diagnosis often ranging from evidence of marked hypofunction through marked hyperfunction.2,13

More recently attention has focused upon the use of measures of affectivity–particularly anxiety, depression, and anger.* This approach has generally been a more fruitful and reliable one. Nonetheless, methodological and conceptual problems remain. One such difficulty is that affectivity is influenced by the experimental setting itself.29,35,42 Another problem is the tendency of individuals to respond stereotypically, regardless of the stimulus employed.6,8,21,22,31 Yet another problem . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MADISON, WIS.

From the Psychophysiology Laboratory, Wisconsin Psychiatric Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Medical Center.

Professor of Psychiatry (Dr. Roessler); Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology (Dr. Alexander), and Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology (Dr. Greenfield).

From the Psychophysiology Laboratory, Wisconsin Psychiatric Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Medical Center.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug. 16, 1962.

This research was supported by grant M-2743 from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.