You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 9 No. 2, August 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ego Strength and Physiological Responsivity

II. The Relationship of the Barron Ego Strength Scale to the Temporal and Recovery Characteristics of Skin Resistance, Finger Blood Volume, Heart Rate, and Muscle Potential Responses to Sound

NORMAN S. GREENFIELD, PhD; A. A. ALEXANDER, PhD; ROBERT ROESSLER, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1963;9(2):129-141.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I. Introduction

This is the second of a series of reports on the results obtained when subjects who were grouped according to level of ego strength were stimulated with various intensities of sound and their skin resistance (PGR), finger blood volume (FBV), heart rate (HR), and muscle potential responses (EMG) continuously recorded. The first report dealt with differences in response magnitudes among high, middle, and low ego strength groups; it was predicted and in general confirmed that the higher the subjects' ego strength, the greater the magnitude of response on all four physiological measures. Other hypotheses tested were that stimulus intensity would be linearly related to response magnitude and that there would be differential rates of accommodation among ego strength groups; the former was consistently supported, the latter consistently rejected. This paper will deal with the temporal aspects of the responses obtained in the same experiment; with the amount . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MADISON, WIS

From the Psychophysiology Laboratory, Wisconsin Psychiatric Institute, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin Medical Center.

Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology (Dr. Greenfield), Postdoctoral Fellow in Psychology (Dr. Alexander), and Professor of Psychiatry (Dr. Roessler).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Jan 3, 1963.

This research was supported by grant M-2743 from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.